Hpi Pro 4
#8086
![Thumbs up](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon14.gif)
Thanks SteveB that was exactly what I was looking for!
![Wink](https://www.rctech.net/forum/classic_images/smilies/wink.gif)
#8087
Tech Master
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On the subject of Ackerman:
If you look at a recent HPI setup sheet there is a spot to place spacers in between the Ackerman and the steering mechanism. My question to the community, what type change would this have? Has anyone tried it? Attached is the portion of the set up sheet with the location. The sheet number is SU-185-2 Thanks for the info guys.
Snowy.
If you look at a recent HPI setup sheet there is a spot to place spacers in between the Ackerman and the steering mechanism. My question to the community, what type change would this have? Has anyone tried it? Attached is the portion of the set up sheet with the location. The sheet number is SU-185-2 Thanks for the info guys.
Snowy.
Last edited by Essnowyt; 10-17-2004 at 05:46 AM.
#8088
Tech Regular
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
maybe bump steer??
just a guess so dont hold me to that
just a guess so dont hold me to that
#8089
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
hi every1 i just thought id rearrange my electrics in my pro4 and put it oall on the bottom chassis all squeezed 2gether and wanted to know is it ok like this.
or will this cause problems see pic below
or will this cause problems see pic below
#8091
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ok mate will do that.
is this becoz it might cause glitching and interfeirance
thanks
is this becoz it might cause glitching and interfeirance
thanks
#8092
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've had best results mounting the reciever on the upper deck right above the servo linkage. The placing the antenna on the deck as well. It gives plenty room for the esc and reduces the chance of cracking the reciever case on a side impact.
#8093
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I put my receiver on top of my servo and use the stock antenna mount position, I haven't had any problems with interference and everythings not squeezed in.
#8094
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by Essnowyt
On the subject of Ackerman:
If you look at a recent HPI setup sheet there is a spot to place spacers in between the Ackerman and the steering mechanism. My question to the community, what type change would this have? Has anyone tried it? Attached is the portion of the set up sheet with the location. The sheet number is SU-185-2 Thanks for the info guys.
Snowy.
On the subject of Ackerman:
If you look at a recent HPI setup sheet there is a spot to place spacers in between the Ackerman and the steering mechanism. My question to the community, what type change would this have? Has anyone tried it? Attached is the portion of the set up sheet with the location. The sheet number is SU-185-2 Thanks for the info guys.
Snowy.
#8095
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Could somebody please explain what the affects of it are?
Thanks!
Thanks!
#8096
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hello X2,
I have not tried Bump inn, but I feel that bump out gives a more agressive steering response!!
I have found that adding a 2.0mm washer under the ballstud out by the hub (No Bump Out/Inn) makes the car more stable and forgiving to drive!!
Eirik
I have not tried Bump inn, but I feel that bump out gives a more agressive steering response!!
I have found that adding a 2.0mm washer under the ballstud out by the hub (No Bump Out/Inn) makes the car more stable and forgiving to drive!!
Eirik
#8097
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Great idea but the consept was executed quite poorly. I have broken two of the outdives in less than 10 packs. one was a side inpact in the main at the start when we where fightinh for position. The other was in practice I rubbed the pipe coming into the straingt. If I would offer the cups in aluminum or springs steel that would rock.
#8098
Tech Fanatic
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by pucho
Great idea but the consept was executed quite poorly. I have broken two of the outdives in less than 10 packs. one was a side inpact in the main at the start when we where fightinh for position. The other was in practice I rubbed the pipe coming into the straingt. If I would offer the cups in aluminum or springs steel that would rock.
Great idea but the consept was executed quite poorly. I have broken two of the outdives in less than 10 packs. one was a side inpact in the main at the start when we where fightinh for position. The other was in practice I rubbed the pipe coming into the straingt. If I would offer the cups in aluminum or springs steel that would rock.
#8099
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sup Reggie. Now you can come back to Carolinarc b/c we are now running 19turn. If you see Brandon, tell him to come and race again, if he want's a challenge.